The authors stated five research questions. The study aimed to examine the effect of Advocacy Training on urban and rural nursing student attitudes toward LGBTQI+ individuals. The study also aimed to establish the overall effect of Advocacy Training on LGBTQI+ members. The third question focused on the effect of Advocacy Training on nursing students’ knowledge about LGBTQI+ disparities. The fourth question sought to establish the impact of Training on nursing student knowledge regarding the LGBTQI+ terminology. The last question aimed to examine the impact of the training on the plan of care knowledge concerning the LGBTQI+ members. The questions also stem from the research problem and purpose.
The authors did not directly list the hypothesis. Instead, it was only implied in the introduction section. The article stated that healthcare disparities could decrease or be eliminated if nurses learn to identify healthcare disparities affecting LGBTQI+ members and provide culturally competent care. Its focus on the effect of education on the provision of culturally sensitive care shows that it logically follows the research problem and purpose.
Theory Framework
The authors clearly identified the research purpose, questions, and hypothesis. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of an advocacy program developed to train students in providing culturally competent care for the LGBTQI+ community members (Tartavoulle & Landry, 2021). The purpose clearly addresses the gap since it examines the program’s effect that will enable nurses to learn how to demonstrate cultural competence in care delivery. Nursing schools could use the program to equip students with knowledge and skill about cultural sensitivity.
If there are research questions and/or hypotheses, list them, and discuss whether they logically follow from the research problem and purpose. If questions/hypotheses were only implied, rather than explicitly stated, describe that.